Top 10 similar words or synonyms for comparing

methodology    0.837634

terminology    0.829787

provides    0.829143

characteristics    0.824408

processes    0.820744

interventions    0.817201

discussion    0.816595

comparison    0.813582

therapeutic    0.811483

correlation    0.810744

Top 30 analogous words or synonyms for comparing

Article Example
Paolo Mancini Per "Comparing Media Systems" ha ricevuto:
Fingolimod Il titolo ufficiale dello studio, che ha coinvolto 22 centri in Italia, è: "A 12-month Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of Fingolimod Versus Interferon β-1a in Patients With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis With Optional Extension Phase"; questo studio ha generato 2 importanti pubblicazioni scientifiche.
Michael Heseltine Since the arrival of the Coalition into power, he was commissioned to draw up "Plan H" or "No Stone Left Unturned" to stimulate growth in local areas. Since then 81 out of his 89 recommendations were adopted. He has derided UKIP as "extremists" comparing them to Le Pen in France. He has refused to comment on the Coalition's policy on Europe, but does support tightening immigration laws. He also also supported George Osbourne's budget measures as of 2013 and Ian Duncan Smith's welfare reforms. He has become an enthusiastic supporter of Boris Johnson labeling him "my successor" as well as praising the Cameron government for its development of an industrial policy. He has opposed the Leveson Inquiry, and moves on the legalization of same sex marriage and proposals for gender and ethnic quotas in business.
Studio clinico La dott.ssa Marcia Angell (ex direttore della prestigiosa rivista medica New England Journal of Medicine) è una critica severa della sanità statunitense in generale e dell'industria farmaceutica in particolare. Lei è stata particolarmente mordace su come gli studi clinici sono condotti negli USA: Many drugs that are assumed to be effective are probably little better than placebos, but there is no way to know because negative results are hidden... Because favorable results were published and unfavorable results buried... the public and the medical profession believed these drugs were potent... Clinical trials are also biased through designs for research that are chosen to yield favorable results for sponsors. For example, the sponsor's drug may be compared with another drug administered at a dose so low that the sponsor's drug looks more powerful. Or a drug that is likely to be used by older people will be tested in young people, so that side effects are less likely to emerge. A common form of bias stems from the standard practice of comparing a new drug with a placebo, when the relevant question is how it compares with an existing drug. In short, it is often possible to make clinical trials come out pretty much any way you want, which is why it's so important that investigators be truly disinterested in the outcome of their work... It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the "New England Journal of Medicine".