Top 10 similar words or synonyms for cadbury_schweppes

kraft_foods    0.825814

pepsico    0.807522

unilever    0.789044

mondelēz_international    0.779933

reckitt_benckiser    0.773908

nestlé    0.773833

pernod_ricard    0.771658

anheuser_busch_inbev    0.761049

coca_cola_amatil    0.752758

frito_lay    0.748300

Top 30 analogous words or synonyms for cadbury_schweppes

Article Example
Cadbury Schweppes Inc v FBI Foods Ltd Justice Newbury agreed with Cadbury-Schweppes and therefore ordered FBI Foods Ltd. to pay a higher level of damages and enjoined them from using the recipe to produce Caesar Cocktail.
Cadbury Schweppes Inc v FBI Foods Ltd FBI Foods Ltd. appealed the decision of the British Columbia Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, arguing that the injunction and award of the first 12 months of profits from Caesar Cocktail overcompensated Cadbury-Schweppes. They claimed that any losses suffered by Cadbury-Schweppes were due to Cadbury-Schweppes’s own cancellation of the licensing agreement, not from competition from Caesar Cocktail, and that therefore they should not have to provide any compensation. Cadbury-Schweppes cross-appealed, arguing that Caesar Canning and FBI Foods Ltd. had effectively “pirated” their secret recipe and that they should therefore be compensated for the full market value of the recipe, as if it had been patented.
Cadbury Schweppes Inc v FBI Foods Ltd The decision of the whole Supreme Court of Canada was written by Justice Ian Binnie. Justice Binnie agreed with the trial judge and the British Columbia Court of Appeal that FBI Foods Ltd. had misused Cadbury-Schweppes’s confidential information, and that the only thing for the Supreme Court to consider was the remedy to grant Cadbury-Schweppes. He felt that it would first be necessary to examine the special nature of the misuse of confidential information as a cause of action.
Cadbury Schweppes Inc v FBI Foods Ltd In determining the value of the monetary award that Cadbury-Schweppes should receive, Justice Binnie rejected Cadbury-Schweppes’s request to be compensated for the market value of their secret recipe for Clamato. He ruled that treating the recipe as if it were patented would be wrong, given that Cadbury-Schweppes had not fulfilled their side of the patent “bargain”. If Cadbury-Schweppes had wanted patent protection, they should have made their recipe public and accepted the time-limited monopoly that a patent grants.
Cadbury Schweppes Inc v FBI Foods Ltd Cadbury Schweppes Inc v FBI Foods Ltd is a Supreme Court of Canada decision on the protection of trade secrets in Canada. It also describes the difference between trade secrets and patents under Canadian law.